Lawyer Seeks Sanctions Against JP Morgan Chase – But Sanctions Are Denied


JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Winget, Dist. Court, ED Michigan 2014 – Google Scholar.

This case is a feud about a mortgage and a bank loan. The defendant, Larry Winget, obtained a partial victory in the district court under which the terms of the parties’ agreement. Winget prevailed on his affirmative defense of reformation. Reformation is a legal doctrine under which a court can amend a written contract to conform the contract to the parties’ agreement. Obtaining reformation is exceedingly difficult and rare.

The problem for Winget is that although he obtained a partial victory, Chase bank prevailed on the liability issues – Winget was liable under the reformed note.

Winget sought sanctions under Rule 11 on the ground that the Bank’s denials of the allegations in the complaint were untrue and that the Bank knew those denials were untrue.

The district court denied sanctions on the ground that Chase had a factual basis for its denials of the allegations. The fact that Chase lost on one part of the case was insufficient to show that Chase lacked a factual basis for its position.

Edward X. Clinton, Jr.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s