StreetEASY, INC. v. CHERTOK, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2014 – Google Scholar


StreetEASY, INC. v. CHERTOK, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2014 – Google Scholar.

In this case, the Second Circuit reversed an award of Rule 11 sanctions against a pro se litigant. The underlying case was a business dispute between a real estate listing website and one of its co-founders, Douglas Chertok.

The litigation was contentious. Eventually, the parties agreed to settle the case. However, the settlement did not last long as the parties soon began quarreling. The district court sanctioned Chertok for three instances of misconduct. The Second Circuit reversed two of the three instances of misconduct and then remanded the case for further proceedings. The Second Circuit explained: “We share the district court’s desire to check Chertok’s less-than-straightforward conduct, but for the following reasons we conclude that the district court erred in sanctioning Chertok on the basis of two of the identified instances. We also conclude, however, that the district court acted within its discretion in sanctioning Chertok for his misrepresentation of what documents he agreed to sign pursuant to the settlement agreement. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s award of sanctions and remand the matter for reconsideration of the appropriate sanction amount in light of this decision.”

Edward X. Clinton, Jr.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s